09th Sep 2007
More on the future of progressive politics in Ireland
Yesterday I posted some of my own thoughts on the future of progressive politics on the island of Ireland.
Ronan O’Brien, a former special adviser to the Leader of the Irish labour Party has written an article which appears in today’s Sunday Business Post on the specific challenges facing the Irish Labour Party. I am reproducing it below with his kind permission.
—————
Perhaps the most over used words in debate around the Labour leadership campaign are campaigning and organisation. Everybody wants to build a campaigning party, rebuild the party on the ground and deal with organisational issues. Such sentiments are understandable, they are after all the stuff of leadership contests and are central to any effective political party but they cannot represent the be all and end all of a new leader’s ambition. For what it’s worth I don’t believe Labour is that weak on the ground. Yes, we have succession issues in particular but in my own constituency in this election we were able to put more foot soldiers on the doors than any other party. Labour receives volunteer support that other parties pay for. Campaigning per se is fine but it is no panacea to our problems. If depended upon excessively, it can be counter productive. It may even garner support locally but hinder progress nationally. The bottom line is that you can campaign for something morning, noon and night but that does not mean you have the capacity (or the public believe you have the capacity) to deliver what you’re campaigning for. The health service is a case in point. The reality is that the world isn’t divided into the black and white that campaigners often imply. Tara and the M3 is a good example. Often, there is a fine line between campaigning and whinging and the Labour party is often too negative and too prone to persuasion by minority interest groups contrary to the national interest. We can be reactionary in the true sense of the word - responding negatively without thinking. Campaigning is no substitute for taking political positions. Suggestions too about the party changing its name miss the point also. Labour and social democratic parties can win elections in the
7. Don’t carp. Despite contemporary problems social democrats have driven much of what is good and progressive over the last one hundred years. Not everything is wrong. Vote with the Government the odd occasion and the public will pay more attention to you then when you oppose them. 8. There is a limit to state responsibilityThe state cannot do everything. If it takes on more responsibilities, it mush shed others or raise taxes. If we call for additional state capacity in some areas and we should, we cannot uniformly oppose it lightening its burden elsewhere. Our case for retaining state control of the national airline for strategic reasons might have been more compelling had we not made the same argument about hotels. But had the state adopted the same attitude to broadband installation as to rural electrification the country’s competitiveness would be greatly enhanced. 9. Communities can be wrongLeft wing politicians often pride themselves on being the voice of their communities. Sometimes these communities can be wrong! Put the national and public interest first. 10. Regulation mattersThe knee jerk response of all politicians to any problem is to impose further regulation. Understandable perhaps, but we must regulate for the compliant majority not the wrongdoers. Excessive regulation stymies initiative and cannot cater for 100% of situations. 11. Trade UnionsThe right of workers to organise remains a cornerstone of our values. But equating trade union interests with the public interest is no longer sustainable. It is time to let the unions go. 12. Fighting our battles in the courtsWe need to win more political battles about our values on their merits, not seek to implement them by the back door through the courts or by placing clauses in constitutions. Our responsibilities as citizens must sit beside our duties as citizens. Finally, what Labour and

Mr O’Brien’s piece is thoughtful. I was particularly attracted by his espousal of “drop the unions”, his statement that for taxation to be justified it needs to be spent well and therefore public service reform is crucial, and finally his recognition that the state cannot do everything so Labour needs to be selective in what it puts as a priority. He didn’t have much space to flesh it all out I know but when he said class matters, what really does he mean? Ireland is not classless, but neither are the strata of society so clearly defined. I think there needs to be a clearer articulation of thinking here. Also, he said globalization matters and therefore trade is important. But that’s trite. Globalisation is bringing about profound changes in how people work, travel, live, fear, invest, etc etc. And much of what it does provides great opportunity but huge risks and instability (for jobs, investments, for disease control, etc). How can the state act as a cushion to these effects? What does it mean to say Globalisation matters?
Nevertheless, a constructive article.