Borderless thoughts on Politics, Public Affairs, the media and anything else that matters from Conall McDevitt, SDLP MLA for South Belfast
RSS icon Email icon Home icon
  • The SDLP, renewal and a new nationalism

    Posted on November 6th, 2009 Conall McDevitt 4 comments

    carmel hannaCarmel Hanna has announced she will be stepping down from the Assembly in the coming months. The party owes Carmel a lot. She has excelled in office and as a constituency representative. The party’s representation has grown in South Belfast during her tenure and the SDLP is now the largest party in the constituency with Alasdair McDonnell MP for this increasingly diverse part of the city.

    There will be an internal party process to replace her which will culminate on December 9th. All members resident in South Belfast will have a say in who takes up the role. That’s over 300 people and I know there will be great debate over the coming weeks about who should take on this important role. I will be asking members whether they think I am the sort of person they would like to see succeeding Carmel. So far the feedback has been very positive.

    In today’s Belfast Telegraph I argue the SDLP does have a big future if it renews polticially and in personality terms.  The full text is below.

    The SDLP should stand for a strong North in a strong Ireland. The leadership battle looks set to be fought out between Margaret Ritchie and Alasdair McDonnell, both formidable characters with strong track records.

    Will it be a personality contest or is this an opportunity to debate the future direction of the party and Northern nationalism?

    My own view is that it must be the latter if the SDLP is to become a major force in Irish politics again.

    The DUP-SF coalition isn’t working. There is no respect between the two parties and this is reflected by their failure to address the rising youth unemployment crisis, the education fiasco or the looming public finance squeeze. Not to mention the stand-off over the big elephant in the room of northern politics, sectarianism.

    Sinn Fein has also seen its vision for an Ireland outside Europe and disinterest in managing the economy – to quote Gerry Adams – rejected by Southern voters. Truth is Mr Adams and the rest of SF’s leadership look old these days. They are where Hume, Mallon and Rodgers were in 1998.

    This creates a series of opportunities for the SDLP.

    The electorate needs an alternative to the DUP and Sinn Fein. Opposing those who want to undermine power-sharing does not mean you should not work with parties which support it. There is an opportunity to co-operate across the community divide on issues which matter. Jobs, education, and the looming public finance crisis are opportunities for the SDLP, the UUP and Alliance to evidence an alternative. Co-operating in the interests of this region is not a denial of community identity; it is an expression of confidence and ambition for the North and this island.

    The SDLP also has to get serious about unity and what it actually means for Northern Ireland and for the rest of this island. The party has said it sees a Northern Assembly remaining in a united Ireland but what does this mean?

    Also, has the collapse of the Republic’s economy made a united Ireland more or less likely and how would people in the Republic respond to the prospect of a referendum in the current climate?

    What would any change mean to the living standards of the least well off? Would it be good or bad for business and public services?

    Such questions have never seriously been posed. To date unity has equalled a one size fits all Ireland ruled centrally from Dublin.

    This vision has given rise to Sinn Fein’s often cited mantra that Northern power-sharing is just a “transitional arrangement”.

    We live in complex and uncertain times, and vague generalities won’t cut it anymore. The SDLP has always been the party of ideas and surely it is time for a party with such a radical past to take up that mantle again, and to have the courage to ask the questions, and articulate a new nationalism.

    The forum on unity proposed by Mark Durkan is the place for such a debate.

    All this will be meaningless if the party can’t sell its vision for the North and this island to a new generation. This means changing the face of the SDLP and bringing forward new public representatives that reflect today’s Ireland.

    The acid test of a good leader is her/his ability to build a talented and ambitious team. The next leader will have to recruit to recruit people who might someday do his/her job.

    The truth is less people are joining political parties today. Everyone’s membership base is shrinking as many opt to support from the outside. Finding new ways of building organisation and bringing in funds will be a major challenge for the new leader. This means making politics more conversational and being at the heart of campaign which transcend party politics.

    The SDLP can see Fianna Fail and Irish Labour support groups in the North as a threat but given neither are contesting elections why not convert them into allies. The new leader can walk alone or seek to broaden the party’s support base from within democratic nationalism and the non aligned middle ground without diluting the party’s independence or integrity.

     

    4 responses to “The SDLP, renewal and a new nationalism”

    1. All the best for the contest – an interesting choice for the south Belfast members between you and Bernie Kelly.

    2. Conall, good luck in the co-option in December!

      Intereting piece. I’ll make a few comments if I may. I’m glad that some one in the SDLP sees the value of making use or at least trying to make use of the Fianna Fáil units n the North. Some SDLP people want to cover their eyes and ears and hope they disapear. From talking to the lads, this wont be happening.

      The second point is related to FF in the North and the SDLP. You say that “The SDLP can see Fianna Fail and Irish Labour support groups in the North as a threat but given neither are contesting elections why not convert them into allies” I think it is fairly clear that we wont be contesting the Westminster Elections in 2010 but no decision has been made with regard to 2011 and beyond. Minister Ahern confirmed this when he attended the launch of the South Down FF Forum. The members up North are determined to run in the locals and assembly and the support is there for it down south too. It’s some thing that the SDLP needs to accept and realise because its not going to go away.

      I noticed in your piece there that you failed to mention Republicanism once. I see that you refer to a United Ireland but no mention of Republicanism just Nationalism. For too long, Republicanism, due to the actions of the Provo’s, was a dirty word until I’m glad to say that Fianna Fáil took on the Shinners and won. Republicanism is something that belongs to all the people.

      To me, the SDLP was the voice of moderate, constitutional republicanism in the North. The SDLP should not be afraid to say it is a Republican party. It should be proud of this and not be ashamed to say it.

    3. [...] McDevitt looks at the question of renewal within the SDLP, and reveals: ‘I will be asking members whether they think I am the sort of person they would [...]

    4. [...] David Adams has an interesting article in today’s Irish Times calling on nationalism to spell out what it means when it talks about unity. Regular visitors to O’Conall St will know this is something I have written about too. [...]

    Leave a reply